News

We provide the latest news
from the world of economics and finance

Back
01 May
Compared to Estimates, Equitable Holdings (EQH) Q1 Earnings: A Look at Key Metrics

Equitable Holdings, Inc. (EQH) reported $3.64 billion in revenue for the quarter ended March 2024, representing a year-over-year increase of 11.3%. EPS of $1.43 for the same period compares to $0.96 a year ago.

The reported revenue compares to the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $3.74 billion, representing a surprise of -2.61%. The company delivered an EPS surprise of +9.16%, with the consensus EPS estimate being $1.31.

While investors scrutinize revenue and earnings changes year-over-year and how they compare with Wall Street expectations to determine their next move, some key metrics always offer a more accurate picture of a company's financial health.

Since these metrics play a crucial role in driving the top- and bottom-line numbers, comparing them with the year-ago numbers and what analysts estimated about them helps investors better project a stock's price performance.

Here is how Equitable Holdings performed in the just reported quarter in terms of the metrics most widely monitored and projected by Wall Street analysts:

  • Individual Retirement - Account Values - Total - Net flows: $1.65 billion compared to the $982.19 million average estimate based on two analysts.
  • Individual Retirement - Account Values - General Account - Balance as of end of period: $57.26 billion compared to the $55.84 billion average estimate based on two analysts.
  • Individual Retirement - Separate Accounts: $41.06 billion versus the two-analyst average estimate of $40.72 billion.
  • Individual Retirement - Total Account Value - EOP: $98.32 billion versus the two-analyst average estimate of $96.56 billion.
  • Segment revenues- Wealth Management: $423 million versus $436.10 million estimated by three analysts on average.
  • Segment revenues- Investment Management and Research: $1.09 billion versus $1.05 billion estimated by three analysts on average.
  • Segment revenues- Corporate and Other: $246 million compared to the $284.67 million average estimate based on three analysts.
  • Segment revenues- Legacy: $210 million compared to the $196.31 million average estimate based on three analysts.
  • Individual Retirement- Net investment income (loss): $510 million versus the two-analyst average estimate of $502.10 million.
  • Individual Retirement- Net derivative gains (losses): -$5 million compared to the -$5.65 million average estimate based on two analysts.
  • Individual Retirement- Investment management, service fees and other income: $87 million versus the two-analyst average estimate of $99.06 million.
  • Group Retirement- Policy charges, fee income and premiums: $73 million versus the two-analyst average estimate of $71.75 million.

View all Key Company Metrics for Equitable Holdings here>>>

Shares of Equitable Holdings have returned +0.1% over the past month versus the Zacks S&P 500 composite's -2.5% change. The stock currently has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), indicating that it could perform in line with the broader market in the near term.

Zacks Names "Single Best Pick to Double"

From thousands of stocks, 5 Zacks experts each have chosen their favorite to skyrocket +100% or more in months to come. From those 5, Director of Research Sheraz Mian hand-picks one to have the most explosive upside of all.

It’s an American AI company that’s riding low right now, but it has rounded up clients like BMW, GE, Dell Computer, and Bosch. It has prospects for not just doubling but quadrupling in the year to come. Of course, all our picks aren’t winners but this one could far surpass earlier Zacks’ Stocks Set to Double like Boston Beer Company which shot up +143.0% in little more than 9 months and NVIDIA which boomed +175.9% in one year.

Free: See Our Top Stock And 4 Runners Up

Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report

To read this article on Zacks.com click here.

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.