News

We provide the latest news
from the world of economics and finance

21 June
POR Added as Top 10 Utility Dividend Stock With 4.70% Yield

Portland General Electric Co. (Symbol: POR) has been named as a Top 10 dividend paying utility stock, according to Dividend Channel, which published its weekly ''DividendRank'' report. The report noted that among utilities, POR shares displayed both attractive valuation metrics and strong profitability metrics. For example, the recent POR share price of $42.52 represents a price-to-book ratio of 1.3 and an annual dividend yield of 4.70% — by comparison, the average utility stock in Dividend Channel's coverage universe yields 4.1% and trades at a price-to-book ratio of 2.2. The report also cited the strong quarterly dividend history at Portland General Electric Co., and favorable long-term multi-year growth rates in key fundamental data points.

The report stated, ''Dividend investors approaching investing from a value standpoint are generally most interested in researching the strongest most profitable companies, that also happen to be trading at an attractive valuation. That's what we aim to find using our proprietary DividendRank formula, which ranks the coverage universe based upon our various criteria for both profitability and valuation, to generate a list of the top most 'interesting' stocks, meant for investors as a source of ideas that merit further research.''

The annualized dividend paid by Portland General Electric Co. is $2/share, currently paid in quarterly installments, and its most recent dividend ex-date was on 06/24/2024. Below is a long-term dividend history chart for POR, which Dividend Channel stressed as being of key importance. Indeed, studying a company's past dividend history can be of good help in judging whether the most recent dividend is likely to continue.

POR+Dividend+History+Chart
Also see:

TCBK Historical Stock Prices
GNTY shares outstanding history
EPV Options Chain

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.