News

Among the underlying components of the Russell 3000 index, we saw noteworthy options trading volume today in Xerox Holdings Corp (Symbol: XRX), where a total of 19,699 contracts have traded so far, representing approximately 2.0 million underlying shares. That amounts to about 120.3% of XRX's average daily trading volume over the past month of 1.6 million shares. Particularly high volume was seen for the $9 strike put option expiring January 17, 2025, with 11,010 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 1.1 million underlying shares of XRX. Below is a chart showing XRX's trailing twelve month trading history, with the $9 strike highlighted in orange:

Hess Corp (Symbol: HES) saw options trading volume of 24,565 contracts, representing approximately 2.5 million underlying shares or approximately 112% of HES's average daily trading volume over the past month, of 2.2 million shares. Particularly high volume was seen for the $130 strike put option expiring January 17, 2025, with 12,000 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 1.2 million underlying shares of HES. Below is a chart showing HES's trailing twelve month trading history, with the $130 strike highlighted in orange:

And Roblox Corp (Symbol: RBLX) saw options trading volume of 60,148 contracts, representing approximately 6.0 million underlying shares or approximately 106.3% of RBLX's average daily trading volume over the past month, of 5.7 million shares. Particularly high volume was seen for the $36.50 strike call option expiring June 28, 2024, with 16,298 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 1.6 million underlying shares of RBLX. Below is a chart showing RBLX's trailing twelve month trading history, with the $36.50 strike highlighted in orange:

For the various different available expirations for XRX options, HES options, or RBLX options, visit StockOptionsChannel.com.

Also see:

RETL shares outstanding history
SHG Videos
SRZN YTD Return

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.