News

Among the underlying components of the Russell 3000 index, we saw noteworthy options trading volume today in Goldman Sachs Group Inc (Symbol: GS), where a total of 29,957 contracts have traded so far, representing approximately 3.0 million underlying shares. That amounts to about 150.9% of GS's average daily trading volume over the past month of 2.0 million shares. Especially high volume was seen for the $490 strike call option expiring July 12, 2024, with 6,478 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 647,800 underlying shares of GS. Below is a chart showing GS's trailing twelve month trading history, with the $490 strike highlighted in orange:

Enphase Energy Inc. (Symbol: ENPH) saw options trading volume of 57,450 contracts, representing approximately 5.7 million underlying shares or approximately 144.7% of ENPH's average daily trading volume over the past month, of 4.0 million shares. Especially high volume was seen for the $110 strike call option expiring July 19, 2024, with 10,563 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 1.1 million underlying shares of ENPH. Below is a chart showing ENPH's trailing twelve month trading history, with the $110 strike highlighted in orange:

And C3.ai Inc (Symbol: AI) saw options trading volume of 54,257 contracts, representing approximately 5.4 million underlying shares or approximately 125.3% of AI's average daily trading volume over the past month, of 4.3 million shares. Particularly high volume was seen for the $35 strike call option expiring July 19, 2024, with 7,269 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 726,900 underlying shares of AI. Below is a chart showing AI's trailing twelve month trading history, with the $35 strike highlighted in orange:

For the various different available expirations for GS options, ENPH options, or AI options, visit StockOptionsChannel.com.

Today's Most Active Call & Put Options of the S&P 500 »

Also see:

Seven Options Myths Debunked
YUMC Dividend History
Institutional Holders of PRE

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.